“Was NOT INVESTIGATED for the PREVENTION of severe illness or death”

… I was responsible there for all animal experiments

… Was the carcinogenicity of this vaccine checked before approval?

… No, the carcinogenic risk was not investigated

… the birth rate collapsed after the vaccination campaign

… A rat study for Comirnaty was conducted inadequately

… essential toxicity studies were sacrificed to speed

… I know of no case with a comparable indication in which all these studies were omitted

… the approval led to prohibited human experiments

… Pfizer’s post-marketing report spoke of over 200 suspected death cases within just two months after approval

… Comirnaty should have been taken off the market

… The Paul Ehrlich Institute has so far received 2,133 reports of deaths after Comirnaty

… In the USA, an underreporting factor of 30 is assumed

… For Germany that would correspond to 60,000 deaths from the vaccination

… with a regulation-compliant approval, Comirnaty should not have been approved at all

… was not even investigated in clinical development for the prevention of severe illness or death

… The Pfizer documents therefore do not allow any recognition of a positive benefit-risk ratio at all

… Did the population receive … the active substance that Pfizer tested in the shortened emergency approval procedure?

… No

For the clinical testing before approval, a highly pure substance was used

The population received a vaccine that was produced with the help of the bacterium *Escherichia coli*

The result is significant contaminations with bacterial DNA,

and the consequence could be a significantly increased cancer risk